The Digital Revolution of Artificial Intelligence: Beneficial Economic Creative Destruction or Systemic Dehumanization.
Wednesday March 6, 2024
By Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay.
Emeritus professor of economics and international finance, Université de Montréal, and of the book about morals "The Code for Global Ethics" and the book about geopolitics "The New American Empire")
"The opening up of new markets, foreign or domestic, and the organizational development... incessantly
revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly
destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one. That process of
creative destruction is the essential fact about capitalism." Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950), American economist and political thinker of Austrian origin, in his book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 1942.
"Every change is a menace to stability. That's
another reason why we're so chary of applying new inventions. Every
discovery in pure science is potentially subversive; even science must
sometimes be treated as a possible enemy. Yes, even science." Aldous Huxley (1894-1963), British author of the 1932 futuristic novel Brave New World, ch.16.
"Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards." Aldous Huxley (1894-1963), British author, in his essay 'Adonis and the Alphabet', 1956.
"Our entire much-praised technological progress, and civilization generally, could be compared to an axe in the hand of a pathological criminal." Albert Einstein (1879-1955), German-born theoretical physicist, 1917.
"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is probably the most important thing humanity has ever worked on. I think of it as something more profound than electricity or fire." Sundar Picha (1972- ), chief executive officer (CEO) of Alphabet Inc. and of its subsidiary Google, in 2018.
• Introduction
The digital revolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI), currently evolving very rapidly, is a technological innovation that uses complex computer programs and sophisticated mathematical algorithms. These robotic systems and AI-based models, powered by AI chips
and using super computers, can automate repetitive tasks, produce texts
and quickly process vast quantities of data, in complementarity with
humans.
However, beyond the economic benefits that would result, there is the threat of a gradual replacement of human beings by intelligent robots, in a number of functions and activities that lend themselves to such a substitution.
Such
technological advances have great potential to profoundly upend
national economies, businesses and societies in decades to come, when
new capital investments replace older obsolete capital investments, and
some categories of workers would be replaced by intelligent machines
that require more specialized workers.
This could even possibly lead to a dystopian 'Brave New World',
if autonomous brain-machines, in the next futuristic era, are capable
of self-improvement and are able to think by themselves, and possibly,
could even learn to program other brainy machines, with hardly any human
input.
• The global impact of industrial revolutions
All technological inventions produce positive advances but can also be accompanied by various disruptions and negative effects.
For
example, the invention of the knife, which can be used to cut bread;
but it also enables one to cut someone's throat. Likewise, the invention
of dynamite
and explosives helped the mining industry, but it also made wars
deadlier and increased the destructive power of terrorists tenfold.
The same is true of the discovery of the fission of the atom, which led to the development of nuclear energy. This invention made it possible to produce electricity; it also made it possible to build atomic bombs and destroy entire cities and their inhabitants.
It
is difficult to know precisely, in advance, what purpose a new
technology will serve, for good or for evil, for economic progress or
for human regression.
• Questions raised by Artificial Intelligence (AI)
As
with any new technology, the AI applications today and their
generalization in the future will undoubtedly create winners and losers,
and not only in the economic field, but also in politics, geopolitics,
social affairs, biology, in arts and even in military conflicts. It is
therefore important to assess whether the winners will be more numerous
than the losers, or whether it will be rather the opposite, with a small
number of successful operators and a large number of expendables.
For instance, what will be the consequences of so-called generative AI models,
like Nvidia's AI systems or those of pre-programmed conversational
robots, such as those of ChatGPT (Open AI), Copilot (Microsoft) or
Gemini (Google), which can generate text, images or other creations?
Will they improve the standard of living and the quality of life of the
greatest number, or will they allow some to get rich, but render entire
categories of workers obsolete and impoverished? In such case, they
could end up increasing income and wealth disparities.
Indeed,
each new industrial revolution in the past made some successful
capitalist pioneers ultra rich. For instance, there was a period in the
United States, in the late 19th century, called the era of the Robber Barons.
It was a time characterized by rich monopolists (Carnegie, Rockefeller,
Vanderbilt, Mellon, etc.), in the industries of steel, oil, railroads
or finance, who crushed competitors, rigged markets, and corrupted
governments.
At the
political and geopolitical levels, is it possible nowadays that some
malicious oligarchies could use such digital machines to better monitor
and control people and to more easily launch wars in the future?
All of this is far from being of purely theoretical concerns. The U.S. Pentagon is already planning to use intelligent robots and drones, controlled by Artificial Intelligence, to wage the wars of the future.
• The short and medium term and longer term economic effects of AI and the four industrial revolutions since 1760
In
economics, the notions of short-term (1-4 years), medium-term (4-9
years) and long-term (10 years or more) can vary, depending on the
economic and financial sectors. For the economy as a whole, it is
possible to refer to short, medium and longer term economic business cycles.
For example, many years passed between the invention of the first giant
computer, as large as a building, in 1946, and the innovation of the
portable computer on the computer market, in 1977, and then the arrival
of Apple's Macintosh computers, in 1998.
The first industrial revolution
(1760-1870) began in the mid-18th century in Britain, in the textile
industry. For the first time in history, overall production and
consumption in a country could grow faster than population, thanks to
the productivity gains that technological innovations and production
techniques made possible.
The
discoveries of new sources of energy, such as those coming from gas and
oil, in addition to that of coal, as well as electricity, were at the
center of the second industrial revolution
(1870-1914). This led to innovations in means of transport (railway,
steamboat, automobile and airplane). Increased industrialization then
caused a demographic migration from the countryside to the cities, which
accentuated the phenomenon of urbanization, resulting in the creation of large cities and mega-metropolises with high population density.
The third industrial revolution
(1930-2010) is characterized by the innovation of nuclear energy and
the advent of the information age, mainly during the second part of the
20th century. It was made possible by the invention of the
microprocessor and by the creation of the first computers, followed by
the innovation of the Internet, satellites and wireless communication.
As for the ongoing fourth industrial revolution (arising from applications of Artificial Intelligence, an expression first introduced in 2011,
at a conference held in Germany to design a new industrial policy for
that country based on high technology strategies), it would be wise to
distinguish an initial period of shock and transition, and a longer
period of gradual acceptance and maturity, which can extend over several
decades, even a century or more.
• A
difficult transition of layoffs, in the short and medium term, for
workers in the tertiary sector most threatened by digitalization and
automation
Already,
institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
Goldman Sacks investment bank, among others, have attempted to quantify
the net effect that applications of Artificial Intelligence will have on
different categories of workers. For the IMF,
40% of jobs in the world could be affected, in one way or another, by
the development of AI. These will mainly be jobs in the tertiary service
sector, which risk being replaced, or affected to varying degrees, by
intelligent robots. Indeed, we can classify jobs likely to be affected
in one way or another by AI systems in three categories:
1-
jobs potentially substituted or replaced, (such as support or
secretarial jobs in banks, insurance companies, accounting offices,
libraries, and in activities of translation, dubbing, etc.);
2-
jobs not threatened by AI because they are performed either outdoors or
because they require physical activity ( e.g. carpenter, plumber,
electrician, painter, roofer, hairdresser, etc.);
3-
the vast majority of jobs will be influenced to a certain degree by AI,
particularly in finance, education, health, medicine, engineering,
administration, cybernetics, video games, etc.
For
example, in a study published in March 2023, Goldman Sacks estimated
how much Artificial Intelligence could influence employment for the
entire American economy. Their conclusion was that AI could replace 7%
of current jobs, mainly jobs of office and white-collar workers, in
years to come. However, the majority of jobs, 63% of the total, can be
expected to be complementary to AI, would benefit from productivity
gains and could even increase in importance. On the other hand, some 30%
of jobs, mainly manual jobs, would hardly or not at all be affected by
AI.
• The role of politics, supervision and regulation of applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The
Artificial Intelligence revolution can undoubtedly both replace and
create jobs, and, by increasing labor productivity, create wealth.
However, this risks causing some upheaval in certain labor markets and
resulting in significant layoffs of workers in some industries.
This
is why governments, responsible for the general interest, must ensure
that there are no major economic and social excesses and adapt
educational programs to the qualifications required in the future. They
must also ensure that workers potentially penalized by layoffs are
compensated and that the new wealth thus generated can benefit society
as a whole, and not just a handful of operators. This will not be an
easy task because there is international competition between countries
to monopolize the beneficial impacts of the new technologies.
Currently,
the countries that are at the forefront of regulating Artificial
Intelligence technologies and AI systems are the European Union, China,
the United States and the United Kingdom. The EU has put forward a
preliminary regulatory and digital strategy framework called the AI Act.
The objective is to identify acceptable and unacceptable risks that
will arise from the applications of new digital technologies. Likewise,
in June 2022, the Canadian federal government introduced the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act
(LIAD) as part of bill C-27, i.e. the Digital Charter Implementation
Act of 2022. The purpose is to guide AI innovation in a positive
direction and to encourage a responsible adoption of AI technologies by
Canadians and Canadian businesses.
• Conclusions
Does
the advent of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution herald an
extraordinarily promising breakthrough for humanity, or does it rather
carry a risk of great confusion and civilizational regression?
Indeed,
many questions come to mind: will humans master the various Artificial
Intelligence systems so that they serve not only the private economic
and industrial interests behind their applications, but also that of
displaced workers and the common interest? Is it possible that these
systems will become so pervasive and so powerful that they could end up
becoming forces of control, dehumanization and enslavement for large
numbers of people?
A first
conclusion is that no one can definitely answer these questions with
precision and with full knowledge of the facts. And if we ever do get
the answers, it may be too late. Consequently, everything will depend on
the uses that we make of this new technology.
The
digital revolution of Artificial Intelligence therefore raises more
questions than it gives answers, as it is a technology that is expected
to evolve and find new applications, good or bad, over time.
A
second conclusion is that countries and economies that fall behind in
adopting the AI technology could experience economic difficulties in the
years and decades to come. Even those economies in the forefront of the
new industrial revolution could expect an increase in incomes and
wealth disparities.
A
third conclusion is that the innovation of intelligent robots driven by
Artificial Intelligence certainly opens up a new field for gains in
labor productivity through creative destruction,
in a certain number of professions and industries. However, it is
rightly a cause for concern, as it could also facilitate cheating,
falsification, confusion and dehumanization of human beings in many
areas.
Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay.
http://rodriguetremblay100.blogspot.com/2024/03/march-6-2024-digital-revolution-of.html
